TMS in the Office: Indications, Devices, Coding, and Whether It Belongs in Primary Care
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation is no longer just a psychiatry-only referral. Here's what NPs need to know before considering it as an in-office modality.
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) has quietly moved from an academic curiosity to a billable, FDA-cleared, office-based treatment with a growing evidence base well beyond depression. For NPs in primary care, family medicine, or integrated behavioral health settings, the question isn't just "does TMS work?" — it's "does it make sense to bring in-house?"
What TMS Actually Does
TMS uses pulsed magnetic fields, delivered through a coil placed against the scalp, to induce small electrical currents in targeted cortical regions. Unlike electroconvulsive therapy, it requires no sedation, no seizure induction, and no recovery time — patients typically drive themselves to and from sessions and return to normal activity immediately afterward.
Indications: Cleared vs. Investigational
| Condition | FDA Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Major Depressive Disorder | Cleared (2008) | First-line TMS indication; requires prior antidepressant failure |
| MDD with anxiety symptoms | Cleared | BrainsWay Deep TMS specifically cleared for "anxious depression" |
| Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder | Cleared (2018) | Reserved for patients who failed medication + psychotherapy |
| Smoking cessation | Cleared | Targets prefrontal cortex to reduce cravings |
| Adolescent MDD (ages 15–21) | Cleared (2025) | Adjunct therapy; multiple manufacturers now hold this clearance |
| Chronic pain / fibromyalgia | Investigational | May work partly via treatment of comorbid depression |
| PTSD | Investigational | Some benefit shown combined with cognitive processing therapy |
| Anxiety disorders (standalone) | Investigational | Not yet FDA-approved as a standalone indication |
| Stroke rehabilitation | Investigational | Adjunct to neurorehabilitation |
| Parkinson's disease | Investigational | Mixed evidence; DBS remains the FDA-approved neuromodulation option |
| Alzheimer's disease | Investigational | Long-term efficacy and mechanism still unclear |
| Multiple sclerosis | Investigational | No curative treatment established via TMS |
| Schizophrenia | Investigational | Evidence insufficient to support routine use |
Devices on the Market
Several manufacturers hold FDA clearance for TMS systems, and they differ meaningfully in coil design, treatment protocol length, and indication breadth:
- NeuroStar — the original FDA-cleared system (2008) for MDD; introduced the "Dash" protocol in 2016, shortening standard sessions from roughly 37 minutes to under 19 minutes, which meaningfully improves office throughput.
- BrainsWay Deep TMS — uses a helmet-style H-coil designed to reach broader and deeper cortical regions; holds three FDA-cleared indications (MDD with and without anxiety, OCD, smoking addiction) and an adolescent MDD adjunct clearance.
- MagVenture — cleared for MDD since 2015, with an expanded adolescent (ages 15–21) MDD indication cleared in 2025; markets itself on lower per-use operating costs since it doesn't require disposable components.
- Magstim — another established 510(k)-cleared system for MDD, widely used in both clinical and research settings.
A standard treatment course across these systems runs roughly 20–36 sessions delivered over 4–6 weeks, with daily weekday sessions being typical.
Insurance and Coding: The Practical Reality
TMS billing runs through three CPT codes, and getting them right matters for both compliance and revenue:
| CPT Code | Description | Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| 90867 | Initial treatment: cortical mapping, motor threshold determination, delivery, and management | Once per treatment course (not more than once per 6-week period) |
| 90868 | Subsequent delivery and management, per session | Once per session for the remainder of the course |
| 90869 | Subsequent delivery with motor threshold re-determination | Used only when treatment parameters require significant readjustment; not billed alongside 90867 or 90868 |
A few coding rules worth internalizing: 90867 should be reported only once per episode of care, not in conjunction with 90868 or 90869 on the same date. If a patient's course runs 30 sessions, the expected billing pattern is one 90867 plus 29 units of 90868 — mismatched counts are a common trigger for payer audits.
On the payer side, coverage has been expanding but remains diagnosis-specific. Most payers, including Medicare Administrative Contractors, require ICD-10 codes reflecting moderate-to-severe major depressive disorder (recurrent or single episode) or documented treatment-resistant depression, generally defined as failure of at least two adequate trials of different antidepressant medications. Some state Medicaid programs have only recently added TMS as a covered benefit, and prior authorization requirements vary widely by payer and even by specific CPT code within the same payer's policy.
Does TMS Belong in Primary Care?
For most primary care and family practice settings, TMS is better framed as a referral decision than an in-house service line — at least initially. The capital cost of a device, the staff training and certification requirements, the session volume needed to make the investment worthwhile, and the payer documentation burden all favor practices with a behavioral health or psychiatric focus, or larger multi-specialty groups that can dedicate staff and space.
That said, there's a real role for primary care NPs even without owning a device:
- Recognizing candidates early. Patients with a documented history of two failed antidepressant trials are potential TMS candidates well before they reach a psychiatrist. Flagging this in your documentation smooths prior authorization for the referral.
- Managing the medical comorbidities that intersect with TMS candidacy. Depression and chronic pain frequently co-occur, and treating one can meaningfully affect the other — a useful framing when coordinating care with a TMS-providing practice.
- Screening for contraindications. Non-removable ferromagnetic metal in or near the head, implanted stimulators or pumps, and certain seizure histories are relevant to flag before referral.
- Setting expectations. Patients often arrive having seen consumer advertising that blurs cleared indications with investigational ones. Being able to explain, in plain terms, what's actually FDA-cleared versus still being studied builds trust and reduces disappointment.
For larger primary care-adjacent groups with integrated behavioral health, an in-house device becomes more plausible — particularly with shorter-protocol systems like NeuroStar's Dash, which improve daily patient throughput and make the economics of ownership more realistic.
Board Prep Corner
Practice Takeaways
- Don't conflate FDA clearance with insurance coverage — verify payer-specific diagnosis codes, documentation requirements, and provider qualifications before referring or considering an in-house program.
- Document antidepressant trial failures clearly and specifically (drug, dose, duration, outcome) — this is the single most useful thing primary care can do to smooth a future TMS referral.
- Frame investigational uses (chronic pain, PTSD, anxiety, neurodegenerative disease) accurately to patients who've seen marketing that overstates the evidence.
- For most primary care practices, TMS is a referral relationship to build, not a device to purchase — unless you're part of a larger group with integrated behavioral health infrastructure.
Quick Board-Prep Quiz
FAQ
- U.S. Food & Drug Administration. 510(k) clearance summaries for transcranial magnetic stimulation devices (NeuroStar, BrainsWay Deep TMS, MagVenture MagVita, Magstim).
- Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Local Coverage Article: Billing and Coding: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) in the Treatment of Adults with Major Depressive Disorder (A57072).
- American Medical Association. CPT codes 90867, 90868, 90869 — Other Psychiatric Services or Procedures.
- Manufacturer clinical and regulatory communications, BrainsWay Ltd. and MagVenture, regarding FDA clearance updates (2025–2026).
